The MVP Myth — What You Should Really Be Building First

The concept of the MVP is widely misunderstood.
It is not a smaller product.
It is a test of risk.

What MVP Actually Means

An MVP is the minimum experiment required to validate your riskiest assumption.

That assumption is rarely technical.

Common risky assumptions:

  • Users care enough to change behavior
  • They will pay
  • They will return without reminders

Building features before testing these is avoidance disguised as productivity.

Why MVPs Become Overbuilt

Founders overbuild because:

  • Building feels controllable
  • Rejection feels uncertain
  • Shipping creates the illusion of progress

But complexity delays learning.

Better MVP Alternatives

Depending on your risk, your MVP might be:

  • A landing page with a payment button
  • A concierge service
  • A spreadsheet delivered manually
  • A no-code prototype with forced constraints

If it feels uncomfortable, it is probably closer to the truth.

The Real Question

Instead of asking:

“What is the smallest product we can build?”

Ask:

“What is the smallest action that would prove this matters?”

Build that first.

Leave a comment